Proposal: Demolition of the single storey shop, two-storey office building and associated outbuildings. Erection of 4No. houses (3x 3No. bedrooms and 1x 2No. bedrooms) fronting onto Queen Street and associated parking and erection of 2No. detached dwellings (4No. bedrooms) fronting onto to the Mill Pond with associated parking and access from Queen Street.
Associated Papers:
Minutes:
The
Site was viewed by the Site Viewing Working Party)
The
Committee considered the written report and recommendation from the
Head of Planning Services to grant permission.
The Committee received supplementary information circulated at the meeting which outlined:
· A further objection to the consultee comments of the Council’s Estates Team Leader
· A Response from the agent to an objection raised to the flood defence scheme and a further response to this response from the objector.
· A response to a query raised by the Site Viewing Working Party with regards to the retention of existing moorings.
The Committee was addressed by the following deputees:
(1)
Mr J Garland, of the Dolphin Quay Action Group, who
objected to the proposal for the following reasons:
a.
The proposal had gathered a high number of
objections from members of the public
b.
The proposal would have a detrimental impact on the
value of neighbouring residential properties
c.
The site and its approved use had a significant
historic value to the local area; the previous occupier having been
required to leave the site in 2012
d.
The benefits of the flood defence proposals were
overstated and there had been alternative flood defence schemes
submitted to the Council that had not been considered
e.
The owner of the site had not conducted an active
and exhaustive marketing exercise which would have sought to retain
its approved use and therefore was in breach of Local
Plan Policies DM2 and DM3
f.
A viable alternative use had been proposed by
another developer which would seek to retain the maritime use of
the site and provide career opportunities for young people and
benefit local economic growth.
(2)
Mr M Pickup, the applicant’s agent, who
supported the proposal for the following reasons:
g.
The proposal and its design were of a high quality,
sympathetic to the local area and would add value and character to
Emsworth
h.
The applicant had engaged fully with the Local
Authority and community and adhered to the pre-application advice
in order to mitigate concerns from the Council and
residents.
i.
The officer’s report outlined that the site
was unique as it allowed for implementation of a wider flood
alleviation scheme and met the Sequential Test and therefore
didn’t breach policy CS15 of the Local Plan.
j.
The applicant had completed a thorough and
exhaustive marketing exercise of the site, however no credible
offers had been received and therefore the proposal was not in
breach of Local Plan Policies DM2 and DM3.
(3)
Cllr R Bolton (County
Councillor) who objected to the proposal for the following
reasons:
k.
There was a history of flood risk in the local area
and the proposed flood mitigation plans would result in an
increased flood risk in other parts of the local area. This would
be specific to Chequers Quay, lower Queen Street and the
A259
l.
The proposal lacks information regarding unintended
consequences of the flood mitigation scheme.
m.
The proposal was inappropriate due to its location
within a flood zone 3 and subject to significant fluvial flooding,
which would be intensified by the proposed flood mitigation
scheme
n.
Other areas within the Borough have shown that the
Sequential Test has been proven to be unsound and therefore does
not preclude the proposal from policy CS15 of the Havant Borough
Council Core Strategy.
(4)
Cllr L Bowerman who also objected to the proposal
for the following reasons:
o.
Concerns have been raised over the flood defence
scheme which was displayed for public viewing. It would create
significant fluvial and tidal flooding which the lead local flood
authority would find difficult to manage
p.
The site remained to be commercially viable and
should be retained for heritage and employment purposes
q.
The proposal was unsympathetic to the street scene
and neighbouring properties due to its height, bulk and modern
design
r.
The applicant did not undertake an exhaustive
marketing strategy of the site and any offers to retain the use
were not properly acknowledged by the agent
s.
The loss of the marine related facility would be
detrimental to the local area.
(5)
Cllr R Cresswell (ward Councillor) who also objected
to the proposal for the following reasons:
t.
The site was within an area of outstanding natural
beauty and the design is unsympathetic to the local area due to its
size and bulk.
u.
The site had significant historic value and the
change of use would cause a decline to tourism and public interest
in the area.
In response to questions raised by the Committee officers advised that:
·
The aesthetic quality of the proposal was a
subjective assessment however officers were satisfied that it was
sympathetic in the context of the harbour setting and conservation
area and neighbouring
properties
·
The proposal included a flood defence scheme and
related to land owned by the applicant, however the overall flood
defence scheme for the Emsworth area was conceptual and not for
consideration by the Committee at the time
·
If the Committee were to approve the proposal,
condition 4 included in the agenda papers must be met prior to
development commencing. The Committee was advised that conditions
relating to drainage were typical for this type of
development
·
The number of sites in the Havant Borough dedicated
to maritime use was limited however the value of this site was
restricted due to tidal reach.
·
There were no mechanisms to define the cause and
effect of certain developments upon tidal or fluvial flooding in
the area and therefore it could not be outlined with absolute
certainty the risk of future flood events if the proposal was
approved
·
The jetties and moorings to the south of the site
would be retained and access provided by a pedestrian access
adjacent to the Lord Raglan.
The
Committee discussed the application together with the views raised
by the deputees.
Members of the Committee raised concerns over the impact the
development would have upon the level of both fluvial and tidal
flooding in the local area but agreed overall that the inclusion of
a flood defence scheme in the proposal was positive and would help
mitigate the flood risks in the long term.
The Committee discussed the design of the proposal with some
members outlining that it was inappropriate and unsympathetic to
neighbouring properties. The majority of the Committee expressed
that the aesthetic of the dwellings would add character and
interest to the area and were content with the designs in the
proposal. It was therefore
RESOLVED That the Head of Planning be authorised to GRANT PERMISSION for application APP/16/00921 subject to:
(A) The completion of an agreement under S106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, in a form satisfactory to the Solicitor of the Council, to secure the matters listed in paragraph 7.40 of the Officer’s report; and
(B) The following conditions, and any others that are considered necessary
(subject to such changes as the Head of Planning may determine):
1 |
The development must be begun not later than three years beginning with the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with the requirements of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. |
|
|
2 |
The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans:
Location Plan - Topographical - DN: 27958-PD-100 Site Plan - DN: 27958-PD-103K Proposed floor plans plots 3-6 - DN: 27958-PD-104F Proposed floor plans plots 1-2 - DN: 27958-PD-105J Proposed streetscene and section plan - DN: 27958-PD-108F Proposed site section A - A - DN: 27958-PD-109B Proposed elevations plots 3-6 - DN: 27958-PD-106F Proposed elevations plots 1-2 DN: 27958-PD-107G
Reason: - To ensure provision of a satisfactory development. |
|
|
3 |
No development shall take place until details of existing and finished floor and site levels relative to previously agreed off-site datum point(s) have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be undertaken in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure the appearance of the development is satisfactory and having due regard to policies CS11 and CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
4 |
No development hereby permitted shall commence until plans and particulars specifying the layout, depth and capacity of all foul and surface water drains and sewers proposed to serve the same, and details of any other proposed ancillary drainage works/plant (e.g. pumping stations) have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Unless agreed otherwise in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the development hereby permitted shall not be brought into use prior to the completion of the implementation of all such drainage provision in full accordance with such plans and particulars as are thus approved by the Authority. Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the locality and ensure that all such drainage provision is constructed to an appropriate standard and quality and having due regard to policies and proposalsCS16 and DM10 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
5 |
Notwithstanding any description of materials in the application no above ground construction works shall take place until samples and / or a full specification of the materials to be used externally on the buildings, including a sample panel of brickwork and flintwork for the properties on Queen Street have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such details shall include the type, colour and texture of the materials. Only the materials so approved shall be used, in accordance with any terms of such approval. Reason:To ensure the appearance of the development is satisfactory and having due regard to policies CS11 and CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
6 |
No above ground construction works shall take place until a detailed soft landscaping scheme for all open parts of the site (including the public amenity space) not proposed to be hardsurfaced has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such scheme shall specify the proposed finished ground levels in relation to the existing levels, the distribution and species of ground cover to be planted, the positions, species and planting sizes of the trees and shrubs to be planted and/or retained, and timing provisions for completion of the implementation of all such landscaping works. The implementation of all such approved landscaping shall be completed in full accordance with such approved timing provisions. Any tree or shrub planted or retained as part of such approved landscaping scheme which dies or is otherwise removed within the first 5 years shall be replaced with another of the same species and size in the same position during the first available planting season. Reason: To ensure the appearance of the development is satisfactory and having due regard to policies CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012.
|
|
|
7 |
No part of the development shall be first occupied until detailed plans for all proposed boundary treatments, including the flood defence wall, which by means of dimensioned cross-sections and construction details shall demonstrate materials, finish, assembly method and relationship with context levels and paving finishes have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and the approved structures have been erected in accordance with the approved details. The structures shall thereafter be retained. Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the locality and occupiers of neighbouring property and having due regard to policy CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011and the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
8 |
Notwithstanding the provisions of any Town and Country Planning General Permitted Development Order, no extension, building alteration, means of enclosure, or additional windowsshall be constructed within the curtilage of the site without the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure the appearance of the development is satisfactory and having due regard to policies CS11 and CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
9 |
The car parking, servicing and other vehicular access arrangements shown on the approved plans to serve the development hereby permitted shall be made fully available for use prior to the development being first brought into use and shall be retained thereafter for their intended purpose. Reason: In the interests of highway safety and having due regard to policy DM13 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
10 |
No development shall take place until plans and particulars specifying the following matters have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority:
(i) The provision to be made within the site for contractors' vehicle parking during site clearance and construction of the development;
(ii) The provision to be made within the site for a material storage compound during site clearance and construction of the development.
(iii) A specification of measures to be undertaken to prevent deposition on nearby roads of mud and spoil from vehicles leaving the site.
Thereafter, throughout such site clearance and implementation of the development, the approved parking provision, storage compound and mud prevention facilities shall be kept available and used only as such.
Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the locality and in the interests of traffic safetyand having due regard to policies CS16 and DM10 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
11 |
Notwithstanding the provisions of any Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, prior to first occupation the windows at second floor level in the east elevation of Plot 1 and in the west elevation of Plot 2 to serve ensuite bathrooms shall be fitted with non-opening lights and textured glass which obscuration level is no less than Level 4 of the Pilkington Texture Glass scale (or equivalent) and retained as such thereafter. Reason: In the interests of the amenities of the occupiers of nearby properties and having due regard to policy CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
12 |
Notwithstanding the provisions of any Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015, prior to first occupation of Plots 3-6 all windows serving a bathroom or ensuite as shown on Drawing Number 27958-PD104 Rev E shall be fitted with, to a height of no less than 1.7m above finished floor level, non-opening lights and textured glass which obscuration level is no less than Level 4 of the Pilkington Texture Glass scale (or equivalent) and retained as such thereafter. Reason: In the interests of the amenities of the occupiers of nearby properties and having due regard to policy CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
13 |
Prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, a Construction Environmental Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Construction Environmental Management Plan shall identify the steps and procedures that will be implemented to minimise the creation and impact of dust, pollution of the adjacent watercourse and waste disposal resulting from the site preparation, groundwork and construction phase of the development. Once approved, the Construction Environmental Management Plan shall be adhered to at all times, unless otherwise first agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests the nearby environmentally sensitive areas and having due regard for policy CS11 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
|
|
14 |
The development permitted by this planning permission shall be carried out in accordance with the approved Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) produced by OPUS International Consultants (UK) Ltd, dated 11 May 2014 and the following mitigation measures detailed within the FRA:
1. No habitable use of the development to occur below 4.8mAOD
The mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to occupation and subsequently in accordance with the timing / phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme, or within any other period as may subsequently be agreed, in writing, by the local planning authority.
Reason: To ensure that the proposed development and its occupants remain safe over its lifetime. This condition is in line with Policy CS15 Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk of the Havant Borough Council Core Strategy 2011 and Section 9 of the Planning Practice Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) for Flood Risk and Coastal Change.
|
15 |
No above ground development shall take place until plans and particulars specifying the siting and design of any proposed external meter boxes/metal ducting/flues and guttering shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of the appearance of the development within the Conservation Area and having due regard for policies CS11 and CS16 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework.
|
16 |
The south elevations on the two detached dwellings fronting onto the Mill Pond shall include the use of non reflective glazing at all times unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of the amenity of the environmentally sensitive setting and having due regard for policies CS11 and CS12 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework. |
|
|
17 |
No above ground development shall take place until plans and particulars specifying the provision to be made for external lighting for all plots have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. There shall be no external lighting on the site other than as thereby approved. Reason: To safeguard the amenities of the locality and having due regard to policies CS16 and DM10 of the Havant Borough Local Plan (Core Strategy) 2011 and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
Supporting documents: