To consider the following recommendation to Council arising from the meeting of the Cabinet held on 13 February 2019. The agenda and reports for this meeting can be viewed via the following link:
http://havant.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=128&MId=10812
RECOMMENDED to full Council that:
(1) The Council invest the available 123 List CIL funds as at 31 March 2018 in
the capital infrastructure projects outlined in Table A:
Title and bid reference number
|
Amount
|
Cumulative amount |
Langstone FCERM Scheme (1) |
£575,000 |
£575,000 |
Hayling FCERM Strategy (2) |
£0* |
£575,000 |
Hooks Row - Shared Pedestrian and Cycle Link (16) |
£115,000 |
£690,000 |
Park Road Corridor Feasibility (3) |
£10,000 |
£700,000 |
Elmleigh Road - Pedestrian and Cycle Improvement (4) |
£269,000 |
£969,000 |
Waterlooville Town Centre London Road Shared Cycleway (5) |
£16,000 |
£985,000 |
Milton Road Roundabout - Accessibility and Safety (6) |
£100,000 |
£1,085,000 |
Hambledon Road - Provision of Cycle Route (7) |
£60,000 |
£1,145,000 |
Warblington Interchange - Feasibility (13) |
£12,000 |
£1,157,000 |
Table A: Current recommended spends and cumulative effect on 123 CIL Pot if all spending options are supported
* Funds are not required for this round of CIL Spending but a future commitment is needed to support the spending of CIL Funds in accordance with Table C outlined below. See also Paragraph 6.3
(2) To commit future 123 Pot funds to the following capital infrastructure
projects outlined in Tables B and C and that the balance of the CIL 123 Pot
be retained to contribute to this expenditure:
Langstone FCERM Scheme – CIL Pot Building Request 2018-2022 |
|||||
Year |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Total |
CIL funding ‘Pot Building’ – Inc. 60% Risk |
575,000 |
575,000 |
700,000 |
700,000 |
2,550,000 |
CIL funding – No Risk
|
359,375 |
359,375 |
437,500 |
437,500 |
1,593,750 |
Table B: Spending commitment requirement for Langstone FCERM Strategy
Hayling Island FCERM Strategy – CIL Pot Building Request 2018-2022 |
|||||
Year |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Total |
CIL funding Pot Building request 30%Risk |
0 |
170,700 |
262,218 |
100,082 |
533,000 |
CIL funding – No Risk
|
0 |
131,308 |
201,706 |
76,986 |
410,000 |
Table C: Spending Commitment for Hayling FCERM Scheme
(3) The Council invest the available Neighbourhood Portion funds as at 31
March 2018 outlined in Table D in the capital infrastructure projects:
Title and bid reference number |
Amount Requested |
Proposed Spend |
Cumulative Amount |
HIADS Ltd (Replacement Lobby) (D) |
£45K |
£22,500 |
£22,500 |
Age Concern Kitchen Renovation (F) |
£27K |
£22,962 |
£45,462 |
Bidbury Infants School Lighting Project (H) |
£19K |
£9,500 |
£54,962 |
Hayling Sports Centre Extension Feasibility (I) |
£18K |
£18,000 |
£72,962 |
Acorn Centre Extension (J) |
£51K |
£19,000 |
£91,962 |
Table D: Current recommended spends and cumulative effect on Neighbourhood Portion if all spending options are supported
(4) The CIL Protocol be updated to reflect current practice in view of lessons learned; and
(5) The Council enter a formal agreement with Network Rail to spend £150K on feasibility only in respect of the Warblington Footbridge CIL Spend as agreed by Council on the 21 February 2018.
Minutes:
Community Infrastructure Levy: Proposed Spending & Revision
of CIL Spending Protocol
Councillor Turner presented a recommendation arising from the Cabinet meeting held on 13 February 2019 regarding the spending of CIL funds.
The Council received a deputation from Canon Kennar, a copy of which is appended as Appendix 3 to these minutes.
The Cabinet recommendation included within the agenda for the meeting was proposed by Councillor Turner and seconded by Councillor Wilson.
Councillor Branson proposed an amendment that Recommendation 3 (Neighbourhood Portion Funds) include the sum of £21,500 for a church access project to make St Faith’s Church, Havant accessible to all.
This amendment was duly seconded by Councillor Guest.
In response to a question, Councillor Turner confirmed that sufficient Neighbourhood Portion Funds were available to fund the £21,500 requested for the St Faith’s Church access project.
Councillors had mixed opinions on the amendment, with members of the Cabinet explaining the reasons as to why the request by St Faiths Church had not been recommended to Council. It had been a balanced decision and whilst the Cabinet had every sympathy for improvements to the church, on balance had voted against the application because it did not accord with the agreed protocol for CIL spending.
Following a vote, Council AGREED the amendment, 21 Councillors voting for the amendment, 9 Councillors Voting against the amendment and 2 Councillors abstaining from voting.
In response to comments made by Councillors, Councillor Turner confirmed that she was happy for the CIL Protocol to be subject to scrutiny as part of the updates required referred to in recommendation 4.
Following the discussion it was RESOLVED that:
(1) The Council invest the available 123 List CIL funds as at 31 March 2018 in
the capital infrastructure projects outlined in Table A:
Title and bid reference number
|
Amount
|
Cumulative amount |
Langstone FCERM Scheme (1) |
£575,000 |
£575,000 |
Hayling FCERM Strategy (2) |
£0* |
£575,000 |
Hooks Row - Shared Pedestrian and Cycle Link (16) |
£115,000 |
£690,000 |
Park Road Corridor Feasibility (3) |
£10,000 |
£700,000 |
Elmleigh Road - Pedestrian and Cycle Improvement (4) |
£269,000 |
£969,000 |
Waterlooville Town Centre London Road Shared Cycleway (5) |
£16,000 |
£985,000 |
Milton Road Roundabout - Accessibility and Safety (6) |
£100,000 |
£1,085,000 |
Hambledon Road - Provision of Cycle Route (7) |
£60,000 |
£1,145,000 |
Warblington Interchange - Feasibility (13) |
£12,000 |
£1,157,000 |
Table A: Current recommended spends and cumulative effect on 123 CIL Pot if all spending options are supported
* Funds are not required for this round of CIL Spending but a future commitment is needed to support the spending of CIL Funds in accordance with Table C outlined below. See also Paragraph 6.3
(2) To commit future 123 Pot funds to the following capital infrastructure
projects outlined in Tables B and C and that the balance of the CIL 123 Pot
be retained to contribute to this expenditure:
Langstone FCERM Scheme – CIL Pot Building Request 2018-2022 |
|||||
Year |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Total |
CIL funding ‘Pot Building’ – Inc. 60% Risk |
575,000 |
575,000 |
700,000 |
700,000 |
2,550,000 |
CIL funding – No Risk
|
359,375 |
359,375 |
437,500 |
437,500 |
1,593,750 |
Table B: Spending commitment requirement for Langstone FCERM Strategy
Hayling Island FCERM Strategy – CIL Pot Building Request 2018-2022 |
|||||
Year |
2018/19 |
2019/20 |
2020/21 |
2021/22 |
Total |
CIL funding Pot Building request 30%Risk |
0 |
170,700 |
262,218 |
100,082 |
533,000 |
CIL funding – No Risk
|
0 |
131,308 |
201,706 |
76,986 |
410,000 |
Table C: Spending Commitment for Hayling FCERM Scheme
(3) The Council invest the available Neighbourhood Portion funds as at 31
March 2018 outlined in Table D in the capital infrastructure projects:
Title and bid reference number |
Amount Requested |
Proposed Spend |
Cumulative Amount |
HIADS Ltd (Replacement Lobby) (D) |
£45K |
£22,500 |
£22,500 |
Age Concern Kitchen Renovation (F) |
£27K |
£22,962 |
£45,462 |
Bidbury Infants School Lighting Project (H) |
£19K |
£9,500 |
£54,962 |
Hayling Sports Centre Extension Feasibility (I) |
£18K |
£18,000 |
£72,962 |
Acorn Centre Extension (J) |
£51K |
£19,000 |
£91,962 |
Church Access Project: Making St Faith’s Accessible to All (C) |
£21.5K |
£21,500 |
£113,462 |
Table D: Current recommended spends and cumulative effect on Neighbourhood Portion if all spending options are supported
(4) The CIL Protocol be updated to reflect current practice in view of lessons learned; and
(5) The Council enter a formal agreement with Network Rail to spend £150K on feasibility only in respect of the Warblington Footbridge CIL Spend as agreed by Council on the 21 February 2018.
Supporting documents: